ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-7125

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	MSI MS-7125 (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '20 at 22:20
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Dual Core AMD Opteron 185 24 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	42% Average	Memory 71.5 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 74.6 41% 61.4 Pts	4-Core 75.4 8-Core 75.2 10% 75.3 Pts	64-Core 74.3 5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PNY(196E 1119) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.14% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 6.77 Parallax 7.16 5% 6.72 fps	MRender 4.29 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 7.22 5% 6.26 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.14% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 256GB-$50 744 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 279 258 305 305 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 346 Write 313 Mixed 250 SusWrite 286 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 28.2 100% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 28.7 45% 85.3 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 131%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: CC4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 160 153 162 173 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 126 Mixed 79 SusWrite 157 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.8 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 97.9 41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-7125 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: MSI MS-7125

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback