Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime14.3 Days
Run DateJan 13 '20 at 11:58
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 264
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 776
77% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 195
Parallax 181
150% 187 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 184
Splatting 132
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,581
Write 2,437
Mixed 1,841
509% 2,286 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 89.3
294% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 866
624% 812 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 234 238 237 238 240 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 272
Write 146
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 235
130% 179 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.1
320% 3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 146%
Great: 238%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 182 182 182 182 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 89.5
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 179
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-4GTZ F4-3200C16-4GTZB F4-3200C16-4GTZ F4-3200C16-4GTZB F4-3200C16-4GTZ F4-3200C16-4GTZB F4-3200C16-4GTZ F4-3200C16-4GTZB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 51.6
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 24.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 125%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback