Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 62.2 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 139 48% 84.6 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 325 37% 290 Pts	64-Core 626 39% 626 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1331) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 3.41 2% 5.8 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 3.73 Splatting 7.39 4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.85% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 626 Write 64 Mixed 122 58% 271 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 20.6 84% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 437 DQ Write 56.6 DQ Mixed 130 125% 208 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 153%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB 28,935 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.8% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.5 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	6,006x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	3,476x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	939x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	1,217x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples	1,035x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	746x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples	848x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples	758x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	733x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16