Alienware M18xR1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAlienware M18xR1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M18xR1
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '16 at 05:30
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2920XM
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 470
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Dell(1028 048F) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 28.2
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 38.6
23% 31.8 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 33.5
24% 28.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 473
Write 185
Mixed 177
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 8.47
54% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 27.2
59% 124 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 82%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
622GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 118
Write 1.63
Mixed 19.5
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.19
36% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M18xR1 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M18xR1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback