Today's hottest deals

Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141204
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 14:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 198
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 364
47% 355 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 866F) 1GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 3.19
2% 2.95 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.13
3% 3.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 129 166 162 174 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 169
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 156
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback