TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 13:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 358
50% 369 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 74.5%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 30
Parallax 37.1
31% 35.2 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 35
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 30.9%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 63 61 64 53 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 448
Write 350
Mixed 315
SusWrite 79.2
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 22.9
84% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 106
101% 165 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 57.1%
 Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
205GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 189 189 191 193 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 155
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 187
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 04CD F3-1600C11-4GIS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 53.4%
 Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples1,321x
Core i3-3220Intel  $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples415x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples386x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples1,390x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples233x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples204x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples132x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples63x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples51x
RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples37x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 3,903 samples30x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples28x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback