QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	9.4 GB free of 11 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '20 at 10:00
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670 23 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 219 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 420 56% 420 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8708) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 143 Parallax 146 126% 148 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 135 Splatting 109 113% 143 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 107 108 101 120 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 396 Write 125 Mixed 118 SusWrite 111 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 17.1 81% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 50.2 68% 126 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 68%
Red Hat VirtIO 11GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 10GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 120 116 120 118 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.8% Above average	Read 394 Write 113 Mixed 123 SusWrite 120 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 16.7 82% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 24.1 50% 105 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 53%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 182 183 184 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 203 Mixed 92.4 SusWrite 181 124% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x11GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 11GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	65.9% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 21.7 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 19.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	141x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16