HP RB042AV-ABA a1410y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP RB042AV-ABA a1410y  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Alhena
Memory0.7 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060905
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateDec 22 '16 at 21:49
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron D 3.20GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 12.9
2-Core 12.9
7% 12.9 Pts
4-Core 20.3
8-Core 21.2
3% 20.8 Pts
64-Core 24.1
2% 24.1 Pts
Poor: 8% Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
BFG(19F1 0943) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.55 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 2.43
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3802110A 80GB-$67
30GB free
Firmware: 3.AHL Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 27.2
Mixed 14.9
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.39
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 38%
Seagate ST360020A 60GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.39 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 22.9
Write 23.1
Mixed 14.6
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 0.18
48% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 16%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
17GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 84.9
Write 76.4
Mixed 19.1
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.3
84% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback