Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '20 at 19:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 119
53% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 149
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 264 265 265 266 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 384
Write 351
Mixed 340
SusWrite 263
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 39.4
127% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 47.4
DQ Write 89.6
DQ Mixed 50.8
44% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 117%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
664GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 99 100 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 86.8
Write 65.7
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 97.2
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 14.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback