Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Memory 28.7 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 39.5 18% 28.3 Pts	4-Core 55.9 8-Core 66.9 8% 61.4 Pts	64-Core 63.1 4% 63.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 32%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 120 145 128 130 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 239 Write 191 Mixed 208 SusWrite 131 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 14.9 50% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 97 DQ Mixed 108 85% 120 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	164x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	27x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	23x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	160x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	44x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	26x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	36x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	18x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16