Asrock H67M-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H67M-ITX  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '20 at 13:04
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 101
2-Core 190
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 501
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Zotac(19DA 3378) 2GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 29.5
28% 31.9 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 30.7
26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 120GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 70 92 92 92 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 378
Write 400
Mixed 248
SusWrite 102
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 30.2
99% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 180
174% 272 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 91%
Mengmi 120GB 120GB
43GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 181 139 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 480
Write 387
Mixed 394
SusWrite 158
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 37.7
123% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 98.5
137% 251 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
900GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 187 185 185 185 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 146
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 173
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
905GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 154 143 184 193 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 175
Mixed 102
SusWrite 152
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 109%
silicon-power 32GB
14GB free, PID 3d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.6 4.2 5.2 5.6 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Read 11.4
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.7
6% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
24% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KBN1333D3N9/8G KBN1333D3N9/8G 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-ITX Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $578
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback