Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '16 at 04:55
Run Duration	427 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	74%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 57 2-Core 110 53% 83.3 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 348 35% 282 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.5% Very good	Lighting 79.8 Reflection 102 Parallax 121 65% 101 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 127 Splatting 105 93% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4346 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 239 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10870091054	85.4% Excellent	Read 497 Write 386 Mixed 411 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 32.9 118% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 90.7 DQ Mixed 55.8 60% 101 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 134%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB 3,103 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 164GB free Firmware: 21.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 176 5525 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6330 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22647 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2278 (C2) HDA temperature 114 1 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.4% Below average	Read 52.7 Write 52.7 Mixed 48.7 39% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.33 99% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 36%
Seagate ST3160828AS 160GB 887 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 71GB free Firmware: 8.04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 54 39 143608005 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 4013 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 486281329 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 26944 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2529 (C2) HDA temperature 29 47 38654705693 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 39 143608005 (C5) Current pending sector count 130 100 4294967295 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 130 100 4294967295 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	23.1% Poor	Read 46.8 Write 33.4 Mixed 39.2 30% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.41 96% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 32%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB 3,683 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 5GB free Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 198 194 2469 (03) Spinup time 169 161 2508 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5113 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6255 (0A) Spinup retry count 91 87 23 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3716 (C0) Power-off retract count 196 196 3694 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 159 159 125306 (C2) HDA temperature 123 79 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	12.1% Very poor	Read 21 Write 21.1 Mixed 20.9 16% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.29 64% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.3% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 9.4 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $121Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16