PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130731 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 09 '20 at 15:10 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | SYC-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.3
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 294 298 299 301 301 MB/s
|
89.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 196 197 195 197 198 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Team--Elite-1333 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 40x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 39x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $370 |