MSI 870S-G46 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870S-G46 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 04:13
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 92.7
45% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 173
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
XFX(1682 3255) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 53
26% 34.4 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 36
Splatting 39.1
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 99 109 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 105
Write 83
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 86.8
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870S-G46 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870S-G46 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback