HP 870-014no

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 870-014no  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 23:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 221
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 438
60% 443 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 95.3
Reflection 101
Parallax 89.5
78% 95.2 fps
MRender 84
Gravity 84.2
Splatting 68.1
63% 78.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 375
Write 288
Mixed 194
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 27.6
101% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 188
159% 233 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
507GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 131 134 134 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 162
Write 154
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 133
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 25.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-014no Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP 870-014no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback