Turbo-x GK150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics65.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTurbo-x GK150  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A320DGS
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 46
2-Core 121
48% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 371
32% 273 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.6% Good
Lighting 83.2
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 57.2
68% 70.3 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 74.7
61% 74.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 505
Write 429
Mixed 451
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 54.1
175% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 199
196% 311 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
634GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 84.1
Mixed 32.9
68% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Toshiba MQ01ABB200 2TB
981GB free
Firmware: AY000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 90 90 91 84 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 27.1
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 76.3
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GK150 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Turbo-x GK150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback