Foxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100430
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 19:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 81.1
45% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 197
22% 174 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 30.4
21% 27.9 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 32.5
22% 26.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 182 166 189 171 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 208
Write 192
Mixed 133
SusWrite 178
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 22.7
79% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 54.6
DQ Mixed 27.9
25% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 89%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
631GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 91 91 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 93.3
Mixed 70
SusWrite 89.7
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 10GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback