Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 14:11
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 15.2
2-Core 36.4
27% 36.2 Pts
4-Core 55.9
8-Core 57.2
8% 56.6 Pts
64-Core 55.8
4% 55.8 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 2.8
1% 3.73 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 5.7
1% 3.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.56.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 28 28 30 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 312
Write 50.7
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 28.9
24% 113 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.7
28% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5674BM0-CK0 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $355Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback