Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory122.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$1,350
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 300
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,181
103% 878 Pts
64-Core 4,367
270% 4,367 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Zotac(19DA 5513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 196
Parallax 172
148% 183 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 190
Splatting 124
146% 188 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 138%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1302 301 311 312 309 313 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,476
Write 1,469
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 475
317% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 83.1
286% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 1106
DQ Mixed 998
763% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 263%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
954GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2521 2526 2527 2526 2526 2526 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
407% Outstanding
Read 2,669
Write 2,501
Mixed 1,530
SusWrite 2,525
518% 2,306 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 84.5
290% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1316
DQ Write 1,223
DQ Mixed 1,276
956% 1,271 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 407%
Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
875GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1326 1328 1329 1328 1328 1328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 1421
Write 1,323
Mixed 1,187
SusWrite 1328
296% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 82.1
278% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 1,176
DQ Mixed 1,251
933% 1,238 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 279%
Great: 425%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3846 3932 3927 3930 3934 3929 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 2,254
Write 3,574
Mixed 2,240
SusWrite 3,916
681% 2,996 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 84.4
288% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,527
DQ Write 1,414
DQ Mixed 1,508
1,122% 1,483 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 484%
Great: 500%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
202% Outstanding
MC Read 80.7
MC Write 83.2
MC Mixed 82.4
235% 82.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 36.4
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 202%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-TRX40 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 279%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $2,703
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback