Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 07:50
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 76.9
46% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 217
24% 187 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.3% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 26.8
25% 26.5 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 27
Splatting 27.4
24% 28.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 278 312 312 315 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 421
Write 290
Mixed 392
SusWrite 311
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 25.9
97% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 85.9
78% 124 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
320GB free
Firmware: 1AA01108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 82 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 81.8
Write 85
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 82.5
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 60%
HGST HTS 545050A7E680 500GB
324GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 86 88 88 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 94.5
Write 80.3
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 86.8
94% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 40%
3GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.2 4.5 4.9 4.6 4.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.3
8% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback