Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131106
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 16:06
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 96.5
55% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 275
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 933 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 54.9
34% 42 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 37.1
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 147 155 148 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 170
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 146
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 26.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 16.2
31% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 59%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
3TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 25.3
Write 25
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 16.3
31% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9KSF25672AZ-1G4D1 CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback