Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111123
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '20 at 15:07
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 47.1 1-Core 37 2-Core 66.1 32% 50.1 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 189 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E152) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.39% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 4.91 4% 5.59 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 7.43 5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.39% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 75 75 73 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 191 Write 81 Mixed 115 SusWrite 73.4 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 12.5 57% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 89.2 68% 92.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 69%
GB0250EAFYK 250GB 666 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 168GB free Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 112 112 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 110 Write 108 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 111 74% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 ACR256X64D3U13C9G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.6% Average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 9.1 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E900 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	45x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	15x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	12x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	41x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16