HP Pro 3300 Series MT

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Pro 3300 Series MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn 2ABF
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '20 at 10:44
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70 10,987 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 143 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 269 36% 267 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0F02) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.92 Parallax 3.28 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 108 84 72 71 45 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 256 Write 235 Mixed 233 SusWrite 102 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 1.5 52% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 19.7 DQ Mixed 4 31% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 100%
Samsung HD253GJ 250GB 4,131 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 117GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 85.8 Write 49.7 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 108 55% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 201% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 75%
Samsung HD083GJ 80GB 617 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 53GB free Firmware: 1AC01117 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 66 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 63.4 Write 49.5 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 66.5 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 58%
H550 USB 2.0 Drive 320GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 142GB free, PID 0902 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 23.7 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 27.9 36% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB 311 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.4 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.4 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pro 3300 Series MT Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3300 Series MT

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	41x
Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples	21x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	19x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	67x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	3x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	3x
CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 12GBCorsairBench 35%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16