bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DX79SI
Memory	43 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121027
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '20 at 22:00
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3970X-$217 2,677 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 485 50% 403 Pts	64-Core 614 38% 614 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Device(1545 0560) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1175 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 26.8 Parallax 27.8 17% 25.3 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 28.9 21% 25.4 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 438 432 447 449 426 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 439 Mixed 375 SusWrite 437 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 79 4K Mixed 43.3 145% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 357 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
WD Re 2TB-$28 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 491GB free Firmware: 01.01D02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 119 120 120 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 137 Write 114 Mixed 104 SusWrite 119 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 83%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB 13,827 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 3.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 24.8 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 26.6 36% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x434D5833324758334D3441313630304331 8x8GB 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 27.8 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 11 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,025x
Core i7-2600Intel $190Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,569x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	933x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,142x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	822x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16