Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 7 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 11:42
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4590-$160
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.5% Good
1-Core 102
2-Core 208
72% 155 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 404
55% 401 Pts
64-Core 404
27% 404 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$181
Gigabyte(1458 22FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 77.8
Reflection 76.2
Parallax 102
20% 85.3 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 69.4
21% 68.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 27%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$69
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 52 65 66 56 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 262
Write 118
Mixed 169
SusWrite 63.5
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 32
116% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.1
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 89.3
70% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$70
323GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 101 89 82 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 28.3
Write 101
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 88.4
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.3
92% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 87%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
3GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.76% Terrible
Read 22.3
Write 8.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 7.7
12% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.76%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT51264BD160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $421
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti $155Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $656SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback