Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191115
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 02 '20 at 12:32
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1056
97% 814 Pts
64-Core 2,028
126% 2,028 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 164
Parallax 169
135% 166 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 143
Splatting 104
114% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 122%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1390 826 827 841 883 891 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1674
Write 2,165
Mixed 1,704
SusWrite 943
366% 1,621 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 47.2
151% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 593
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 422
329% 458 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 193%
Great: 491%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
629GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 993 991 960 711 695 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 1,549
Mixed 1,363
SusWrite 955
313% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 42.5
150% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 639
486% 650 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 202%
Great: 310%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 91 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 93.1
65% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 107%
Toshiba MD03ACA300V 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: FL2V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 162 168 167 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 159
Mixed 62
SusWrite 166
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 93%
Toshiba MN04ACA400 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 189 191 191 190 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 186
Mixed 96
SusWrite 190
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
252% 2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MD05ACA800 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 212 214 210 210 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 176
Mixed 92
SusWrite 210
125% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 132%
Toshiba MD05ACA800 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 209 209 204 210 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 195
Mixed 79
SusWrite 207
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
254% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 31.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 29
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback