| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus Rampage Formula (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100311 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 02 '20 at 11:26 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | LVA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
57.5%
Above average
|
50% 78.1 Pts
|
27% 201 Pts
|
13% 204 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7850-$174
MSI(1462 2731) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.3
|
21.5%
Poor
|
21% 28.2 fps
|
22% 26.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 238 246 228 238 246 MB/s
|
74%
Very good
|
54% 239 MB/s
|
131% 46.1 MB/s
|
103% 165 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
23.7%
Poor
|
22% 7.57 GB/s
|
17% 6 GB/s
|
51% 78.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 36x |
| Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 34x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 7x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $248 |