Apple MacPro3,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro3,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F42C88C8
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080229
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 02 '20 at 01:13
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 79
40% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 267
26% 210 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 112
Parallax 137
78% 115 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 133
Splatting 111
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 121 103 131 110 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.5% Average
Read 159
Write 183
Mixed 148
SusWrite 110
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 23.1
87% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 49.1
40% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 126%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 99 98 103 104 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 119
Write 34.3
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 96.6
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 110%
WD Re 2TB-$28
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 128 136 129 135 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 116
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 130
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
RSH-319 ASM1153E 640GB
233GB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
Read 99.2
Write 97.5
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 36.2
97% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.33 MB/s
RSH-319 ASM1153E 500GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 35 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.2% Poor
Read 73.5
Write 74.3
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 35.6
78% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
RSH-319 ASM1153E 1TB
230GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 36.3
104% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
145% 1.83 MB/s
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
487GB free, PID 25ee
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 26 26 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 89
Write 90
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 25.8
83% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27%
Great: 100%
RSH-319 ASM1153E 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 36 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 36.3
120% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
147% 1.8 MB/s
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
179GB free, PID 0200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 26 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 29
SusWrite 26.7
80% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
426GB free, PID 2329
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.6 9.5 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 37
Write 33.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 9.5
34% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 21%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
202GB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 37 36 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 181
Mixed 172
SusWrite 36.5
185% 141 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 23.1
1,730% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 32.4
DQ Mixed 27.8
2,140% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 116%
Great: 376%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.1% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro3,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback