PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-F42C88C8 |
Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080229 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 02 '20 at 01:13 |
Run Duration | 275 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
47.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
84.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 121 103 131 110 100 MB/s
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 99 98 103 104 89 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
76.2%
Very good
|
||||
29.2%
Poor
|
||||
23.2%
Poor
|
||||
33.4%
Below average
|
||||
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
487GB free, PID 25ee
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 26 26 29 MB/s
|
27%
Poor
|
|||
36.5%
Below average
|
||||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
179GB free, PID 0200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 26 26 26 27 MB/s
|
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
426GB free, PID 2329
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.6 9.5 9.5 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
202GB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 37 36 37 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples | 98x |
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples | 19x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 22x |
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples | 11x |
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $388 |