Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '16 at 14:11
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 173
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 323
40% 305 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB
CLim: 1255 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 488
Write 191
Mixed 211
65% 297 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 15.4
70% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 67.8
DQ Mixed 50.1
63% 117 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 76%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 107
Write 154
Mixed 128
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 5.33
4K Mixed 0.64
194% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung HM251JI 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 2SS00_01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 62.3
Mixed 57.7
44% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UD3H Builds (Compare 1,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback