Acer Aspire TC-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-605
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 01 '20 at 20:04
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 205
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 600
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Sapphire(174B 326A) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.73
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 4.44
4% 4.54 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 6.26
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 142 149 158 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 145
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 148
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB
29GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.1 5.1 4.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 30.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 5.1
14% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-605 Builds (Compare 987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback