Fujitsu ESPRIMO P5625

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P5625  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2721-A1
Memory4.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '20 at 19:54
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
Socket AM2+, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 74.6
41% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 156
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Gainward(10B0 0401) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.23
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 1.5
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 3.26
3% 3.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 223.58G 240GB
31GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 43 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 62.4
Write 56.8
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 44.2
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P5625 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P5625

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback