ECS KAM1-I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardECS KAM1-I  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 18 '16 at 05:52
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 50.1
29% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 99.3
8-Core 101
13% 100 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Elitegroup(1019 9A3A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 4
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.54 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 2.07
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 115
Write 112
Mixed 109
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.72
128% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KAM1-I Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS KAM1-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback