bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory23.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory12.3 GB free of 23.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 06:09
Run Duration483 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5540
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 93.9
48% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 156
27% 189 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 172GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5
4% 5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 75%
Msft Virtual Disk 848GB
78GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3
Mixed 1.8
2% 2.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.05 MB/s
Msft Virtual Disk 268GB
82GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1.1 1.2 0.5 1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 1
4% 4.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 23GB
null MHz
3968, 20032 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.6% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback