Asus GL702ZC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus GL702ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702ZC
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 00:41
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 208
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 642
63% 517 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 1A60) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1077 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 61.6
32% 52 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 48.6
41% 50.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 35%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1002 256GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 350
Mixed 175
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 24.7
86% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 90
DQ Mixed 44.8
38% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 89%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
19GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 54.2
Write 48.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 125
43% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.2
147% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 71%
Asmt USB3.0 2TB
18GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 68 74 68 75 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 67
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 75
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 100%
Asmt USB3.0 3TB
21GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 64 70 62 69 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 49
Write 56
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 69.6
46% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
159% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 87%
KINGSTON SV300S37A240G 240GB
20GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 76 70 81 89 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 167
Mixed 171
SusWrite 88.6
201% 152 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 19.4
1,557% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 19.6
1,595% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 125%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R7416G2400S2S Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702ZC Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback