Acer Aspire A315-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 22:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 148
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 223
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.41.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 8.38
5% 9.57 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 14.2
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 186 182 132 108 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 955
Write 406
Mixed 411
SusWrite 156
106% 482 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 37.7
165% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 240
197% 279 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS824A.M8FF Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 8GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.5% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-42 Builds (Compare 557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback