Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_X570ZD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_X570ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 21:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 212
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 516
49% 407 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0328D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 228 219 263 255 257 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,202
Write 972
Mixed 126
SusWrite 272
194% 893 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 73
238% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 786
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 490
433% 650 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 212%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 27.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 23.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_X570ZD Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_X570ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback