HP p6618fr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p6618fr  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 137
54% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 196
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2130) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.66
0% 1.24 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2
1% 1.56 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 70 75 74 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 71.3
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 62%
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB
108GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 30
Write 21.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 23.7
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AD80AD80 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6618fr Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6618fr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback