TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 07:35
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 243
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 704
75% 600 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 92.6%
 Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIe SS 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 994 522 301 302 301 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,485
Write 996
Mixed 1,099
SusWrite 453
225% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 55.1
190% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 924
DQ Mixed 712
566% 781 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 182%
 Great: 203%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
126GB free
Firmware: S0530B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 443 268 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 480
Write 404
Mixed 374
SusWrite 198
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 32.5
139% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 52.1
111% 227 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 87.2%
 Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
613GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 150 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 165
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 150
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 97.8%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-137.A00G 017A 78.C1GMM.AUW0C 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 69.7%
 Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples658x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples452x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples447x
GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples232x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples190x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples119x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples129x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples113x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples108x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples197x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples94x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples80x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback