Asus F5RL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus F5RL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F5RL
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 06:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T2310-$4
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 51.2
1-Core 16.6
2-Core 32.7
24% 33.5 Pts
4-Core 33
8-Core 32.9
4% 33 Pts
64-Core 33.1
2% 33.1 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 1100
Asus(1043 1402) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.400.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.31
0% 0.2 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0920A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 125 178 186 188 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.3% Average
Read 215
Write 182
Mixed 178
SusWrite 173
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 16.8
70% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 53.7
DQ Mixed 21.4
21% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.95% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 1.7
6% 2.23 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback