Acer Aspire T3-600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire T3-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire T3-600
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 02:01
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 394
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 85F1) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 8.23
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 10.4
7% 8.98 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 7.83
Splatting 8.57
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 291 290 290 288 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 453
Mixed 403
SusWrite 300
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 40
130% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
883GB free
Firmware: JU002U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 140 143 137 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 136
Mixed 55
SusWrite 140
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
240% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
866GB free
Firmware: AX003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 110
66% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
839GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 88 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 85.5
Write 59
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 87.5
55% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
808GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 172 174 172 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 128
Mixed 74
SusWrite 173
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
779GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 85 86 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 81.5
Write 60
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 84.3
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF Adata AM2U16BC4P2-B05B Adata AM2U16BC4P2-B05B 16GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire T3-600 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire T3-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback