Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190827
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '19 at 21:04
Run Duration	412 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 235 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 848 78% 650 Pts	64-Core 1855 115% 1855 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37C8) ≥ 4GB; CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95% Outstanding	Lighting 109 Reflection 107 Parallax 89.8 89% 102 fps	MRender 177 Gravity 127 Splatting 102 107% 135 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB 613 User benchmarks, average bench 300% 760GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1657 1662 1653 1484 1494 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	305% Outstanding	Read 2,521 Write 2,357 Mixed 1,905 SusWrite 1,562 468% 2,086 MB/s	4K Read 60.6 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 76.8 250% 83.5 MB/s	DQ Read 768 DQ Write 606 DQ Mixed 674 508% 683 MB/s
Poor: 183% ↑ This bench: 305% Great: 382%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 762GB free Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1490 1925 1936 1877 1944 1906 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	305% Outstanding	Read 2,394 Write 1,968 Mixed 1,452 SusWrite 1,846 429% 1,915 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 64.2 210% 70.2 MB/s	DQ Read 853 DQ Write 547 DQ Mixed 506 429% 635 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 305% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB 612 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 214GB free Firmware: 1B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1267 1435 770 769 792 795 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	273% Outstanding	Read 2,524 Write 2,324 Mixed 1,826 SusWrite 971 428% 1,912 MB/s	4K Read 62.6 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 77.6 256% 85.8 MB/s	DQ Read 837 DQ Write 632 DQ Mixed 723 544% 731 MB/s
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 332%
WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB 1,186 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 7TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 200 200 193 201 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 193 Write 197 Mixed 95 SusWrite 198 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 1 10% 4.5 MB/s	DQ Read 0.9 DQ Write 3.8 DQ Mixed 4.2 3% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 23%
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 484GB free Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 143 107 107 106 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 498 Write 452 Mixed 372 SusWrite 164 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 35.5 135% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 214 191% 287 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 93%
WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB 1,186 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 185 179 179 179 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 184 Write 184 Mixed 108 SusWrite 181 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 11.2 4K Mixed 1.2 10% 4.6 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 3.3 DQ Mixed 4 2% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 23%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$235 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 5.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 183 177 178 182 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 170 Mixed 89.7 SusWrite 179 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1 295% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	MC Read 78.3 MC Write 79.1 MC Mixed 75.8 222% 77.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 42 SC Mixed 30.1 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 188%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	58x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	35x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	21x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	13x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	7x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 102%, 1,063 samples	9x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	7x
F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR 64GBUnknownBench 102%, 20 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,030

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16