EVGA 141-BL-E757

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 57% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 141-BL-E757 (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110825
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '19 at 17:58
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%
CPU Throttled	57%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 960-$220 16,233 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 83.6 1-Core 42.8 2-Core 82 47% 69.5 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 198 22% 174 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 128GB 2,148 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2180006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 237 237 236 237 237 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.4% Good	Read 252 Write 236 Mixed 187 SusWrite 234 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 29.2 104% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 125 108% 160 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 95%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 160GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 71 71 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 67.2 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 70.5 44% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 43%
Jmicron Generic 128GB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 21GB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 19 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 16.1 15% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 7.5 1,282% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 24%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 91GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 11 11 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 24.5 Write 17.2 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 11.7 24% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 2.4 286% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 141-BL-E757 Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 141-BL-E757

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	39x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	28x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	23x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	19x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	21x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	21x
5x2GBUnknownBench 41%, 1,886 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16