Gigabyte GA-X48-DS5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X48-DS5  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 109
52% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 218
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1750 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.6% Very good
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 99.8
Parallax 183
58% 118 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 131
Splatting 142
103% 123 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 221 223 222 223 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
77.6% Very good
Read 256
Write 218
Mixed 227
SusWrite 221
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 41.5
147% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 187
141% 189 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
466GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 129 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 128
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X48-DS5 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X48-DS5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback