HP HPE-340it

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP HPE-340it (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '19 at 14:16
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 135 66% 105 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 369 40% 316 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 6870) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.65% Terrible	Lighting 6.03 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 5 5% 5.87 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 5.3 4% 5.02 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.65% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB 24,830 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 88 88 87 90 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.2% Below average	Read 198 Write 194 Mixed 164 SusWrite 85.5 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 20.8 77% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 24.4 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 31.8 30% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 565GB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 80 81 82 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 147 Write 106 Mixed 65.2 SusWrite 80.4 73% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 451GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 88 88 87 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 86.6 Write 77.3 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 87.9 49% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 107%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 707GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 80 81 82 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 99.1 Mixed 77 SusWrite 80.4 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GB 699 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.9% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.1 21% 7.27 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16