Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 72.8 36% 56 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 134 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8015) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.7.1 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.19 Parallax 3 0% 1.19 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 177 299 316 313 320 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 431 Write 376 Mixed 378 SusWrite 255 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 41 133% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 179 136% 182 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 F3-1866C11-8GRSL 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20% Very poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.8 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	448x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	407x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	393x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	900x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	876x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	387x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	375x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	325x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	201x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28