EVGA 132-BL-E758

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardEVGA 132-BL-E758  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 20:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 96.3
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 124
60% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 444
35% 311 Pts
64-Core 526
33% 526 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2678) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 46.5
28% 38 fps
MRender 47.7
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 35.9
33% 41 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 68 66 57 65 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 64.5
Write 56.5
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 62.6
14% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 11
38% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 66.3
DQ Mixed 24.6
24% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
58GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 82 93 83 105 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 86.5
Write 69.5
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 87.1
47% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
167% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 109%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 1TB
83GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 17.4
Write 12.7
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 20.8
21% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 74%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 2.8 2.9 3.4 2.7 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Read 23
Write 17.5
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 3
19% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 18
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-BL-E758 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 132-BL-E758

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback