Asrock H110M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160122
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 17:41
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 194
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 314
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 29.2
28% 32 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 30
Splatting 29.8
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 76 100 101 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 200
Write 148
Mixed 139
SusWrite 81.4
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 37.5
130% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 86.5
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 114
87% 116 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 121 120 120 107 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 150
Write 152
Mixed 94
SusWrite 116
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 109%
Intenso Business 32GB
30GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 4 6.8 6.8 6.3 6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 5.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.1
10% 8.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback