Asus Z97-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-E  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '19 at 06:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 272
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 532
73% 542 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 150
Parallax 158
128% 155 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 133
Splatting 107
112% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 181 212 275 209 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.3% Below average
Read 152
Write 95.3
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 224
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 11.5
48% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 115
89% 115 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB
750GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 404 315 318 495 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 521
Write 475
Mixed 410
SusWrite 386
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 49.7
187% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 205
195% 305 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 117%
Great: 114%
WD My Passport 259D 3TB
164GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 54 55 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
29% Poor
Read 89.2
Write 75
Mixed 59
SusWrite 54.2
90% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 1302 1600 CL9 Series 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 1302 1600 CL9 Series 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 21.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-E Builds (Compare 699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback