Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7752
Motherboard	MSI Z77A-G45 Thunderbolt (MS-7752) (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130305
Uptime	10.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '19 at 01:13
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 92 2-Core 183 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 345 45% 338 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	4.95% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 43.6 0% 25.5 fps	MRender 27.9 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 0.09 14% 20.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: X411 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 82 85 63 83 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 437 Write 317 Mixed 219 SusWrite 91.9 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 28.9 92% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 33.8 101% 222 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 958GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 179 182 179 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 128 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 179 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 623GB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 18.3 Write 17.7 Mixed 23 SusWrite 19.6 27% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.4 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-076.A00LF 2x4GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	6x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	5x
RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 73%, 3,160 samples	5x
K66GKY-ETF Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 K66GKY-ETF Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 24GBKingstonBench 46%, 5 samples	4x

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $234

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16