Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 23:33
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$194
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 56.4
2-Core 135
58% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 389
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 59.2
38% 46 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 39.1
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 263 261 241 224 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 445
Write 367
Mixed 197
SusWrite 251
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 31.1
113% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 141
132% 206 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
156GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 111 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 32
SusWrite 111
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
57GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 117 121 124 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 128
Write 143
Mixed 32
SusWrite 120
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 108%
LaCie Rugged FW USB3 1TB
690GB free, PID 1061
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 71
Write 50.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 75
81% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback